The US Supreme Court on Monday denied Donald Trump’s petition for rehearing in the E. Jean Carroll case, refusing for the second time to involve itself in the long-running civil matter. The order arrived with no explanation and no noted dissents. It leaves standing a 2023 jury verdict that found Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll and then defaming her, along with the $5 million judgment attached to it.
What the Court Actually Did
This was not a ruling on the merits. The justices never heard argument, never reviewed the evidence, and issued no opinion on whether the jury got it right. A petition for rehearing asks the Court to reconsider its own earlier refusal to take a case. Monday’s order denied that request, which means the Court has now declined twice to disturb the judgment below.
The practical effect is simple: the lower-court judgment stays exactly where it was. Nothing about the order changes the amount, expands it, or endorses it. It just closes the last door.
The Verdict Behind the Case
In 2023, a Manhattan jury found Trump liable in a civil trial for sexually abusing Carroll and for defaming her when he denied her account. The jury awarded $5 million. This was a civil proceeding decided on a preponderance of the evidence, not a criminal conviction, and it carried no possibility of jail time.
Trump appealed. The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the trial record and affirmed the verdict, finding no errors that would justify a new trial. That affirmance is what the Supreme Court has now twice declined to review.
The Money Has Already Been Paid
One detail gets lost in most coverage: Carroll has already been paid. She received more than $5.6 million in July — the $5 million in damages plus post-judgment interest — after Trump lost a July 8 bid at the appeals court to delay payment while he pursued further review.
So Monday’s order did not create a new bill. The money changed hands more than a month ago. What the order settled was whether the finding behind that payment could still be undone. It cannot.
The Argument Trump Made
Trump’s rehearing petition argued that presidential-immunity questions raised in a separate Carroll case should also bear on this one. It was a long shot by any measure. The Supreme Court has not granted a rehearing petition since the 1960s, and it granted no exception here.
Carroll’s attorney said the verdict is now final and cannot be challenged in any court.
What Is Still Pending
A second case remains open, and it should not be confused with this one. Carroll also won an $83.3 million defamation verdict tied to statements Trump made in 2019. That judgment is a separate matter with its own petition still before the Supreme Court, and the justices are not expected to indicate whether they will take it up until at least the fall.
Monday’s order resolves nothing in that case. The two verdicts are distinct, and only the $5 million one is finished.
What This Means for Americans
The practical takeaway is about accountability and how slowly it arrives. A civil jury reached a finding of sexual abuse against a man who is now president. That finding survived a full appellate review, produced a payment of more than $5.6 million, and has now outlasted every attempt to erase it. For anyone who has watched cases like this stall out or quietly disappear, the outcome is a reminder that a jury’s verdict can hold — but only after years of appeals that most people could never afford to fight.
It also draws a clear line for the record. The finding was not overturned, not vacated, and not softened. It is permanent.
Stay informed on the stories that matter most. Follow Your Daily Updates on Facebook and bookmark yourdailyupdates.news for breaking news and analysis.